Interpretation of human fragility through empathy

humanistic perspective from the philosophy of Edith Stein

Authors

  • Juan Camilo Giraldo Molina Universidad Católica de Oriente ; Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47286/23461209.664

Keywords:

Empathy, Edith Stein, Fragility, Otherness, Community, Lived experience, Vulnerability, Epimeleia

Abstract

This reflective article explores philosopher Edith Stein’s thoughts on empathy and, in this context, examines it as a lens through which to interpret the inherent fragility of the human condition—not merely as a discursive exercise but as a sociocritical endeavor. Her philosophical propositions on the subject help us understand that life is a form of coexistence or a higher self that requires experiencing the self of others. This vision restores the authentic meaning of empathy, moving beyond its conventional understanding as a feeling of compassion or solidarity in the face of another’s pain, and transcends into the dimension of a life project, in which otherness or closeness to the other is an indispensable part of that project. For this reason, empathy is the opposite of indifference and selfishness, and, even more so, of the utilitarian vision of a materialistic and consumerist society. To achieve this goal, the methodology of discourse analysis, the qualitative approach, and the sociocritical paradigm were employed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Camilo Giraldo Molina, Universidad Católica de Oriente ; Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana

Canonical Bachelor in Philosophy, theologian, Bachelor’s degree in Social Sciences, and Master’s degree in Humanities. Undergraduate university lecturer at the Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana and graduate lecturer at the Universidad Católica de Oriente. Principal of Colegio Ana María Janer.

References

Alape, R. (2015). Estética, empatía y mística. En A. Botero; C. Gómez (Ed). Misticismo y filosofía (93-105). Universidad del Rosario.

Cesar, C. (2009). La vulnerabilidad de lo social: una mirada a tres discursos sobre lo vulnerable (171-178). Revista trabajo social (10), 171-188.

Foucault, M. (1983). El sujeto y el poder. Más allá del estructuralismo y la hermenéutica. Universidad de Chicago.

Husserl, E. (2013). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Nietzsche, F. (2000). La voluntad de poder. Un ensayo de la transmutación de todos los valores. Edaf.

Ramírez, J. (2021). Entre el aquí y el allí territorial: un ahí incierto del sujeto. En J. Cifuentes Yarce & G. Muñoz Martín (Eds.), Humanismo y transhumanismo: reflexiones desde las ciencias humanas y sociales (pp. 65–76). Editorial UPB.

Ramírez, J. (2021). La presencia materna en la vida de Edith Stein. Revista Universidad Católica de Oriente, 32(47), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.47286/01211463.343

Savater, F. (1992). Política para Amador. Ariel.

Stein, E. (2004). Sobre el problema de la empatía. Trotta.

Stein, E. (2007). La estructura de la persona humana. Biblioteca de autores cristianos.

Stein, E. y Caballero Bono, J. L. (2004). Sobre el problema de la empatía. Trotta.

Tudela, J. (2002). El sentido de la vulnerabilidad humana. La proximidad sensible en E. Levinas. Revista AnáMnesis (24).

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Giraldo Molina, J. C. (2026). Interpretation of human fragility through empathy: humanistic perspective from the philosophy of Edith Stein. Kénosis, 13(24), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.47286/23461209.664

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.